Visualization, inductive reasoning, and memory span as components of fluid intelligence: Implications for technology education

Jeffrey Buckley, Niall Seery, Donal Canty, Lena Gumaelius

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The philosophy and epistemology of technology education are relatively unique as the subject largely focusses on acquiring task specific relevant knowledge rather than having an explicit epistemological discipline boundary. Additionally, there is a paucity of intelligence research in technology education. To support research on learning in technology education, this paper describes two studies which aimed to identify cognitive factors which are components of fluid intelligence. The results identify that a synthesis of visualization, short-term memory span and inductive reasoning can account for approximately 28% to 43% of the variance in fluid intelligence. A theoretical rationale for the importance of these factors in technology education is provided with a discussion for their future consideration in cognitive interventions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)64-77
    Number of pages14
    JournalInternational Journal of Educational Research
    Volume90
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

    Keywords

    • Cognitive interventions
    • Fluid intelligence
    • Learning
    • Spatial ability
    • Technology education

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Visualization, inductive reasoning, and memory span as components of fluid intelligence: Implications for technology education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this