The ideal voting interface: classifying usability

Damien Macnamara, Paul Gibson, Ken Oakley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This work presents a feature-oriented taxonomy for commercial electronic voting machines, which focuses on usability aspects. Based on this analysis, we propose a ‘Just-Like-Paper’ (JLP) classification method which identifies five broad categories of eVoting interface. We extend the classification to investigate its application as an indicator of voting efficiency and identify a universal ten-step process encompassing all possible voting steps spanning the twenty-six machines studied. Our analysis concludes that multi-functional and progressive interfaces are likely to be more efficient versus multi-modal voter-activated machines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-196
Number of pages15
JournaleJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Classification
  • EVoting
  • ICT
  • Interface
  • Usability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The ideal voting interface: classifying usability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this