TY - GEN
T1 - Rethinking the aggressiveness of SCTP switchover in high delay networks
AU - Sethiya, V.
AU - Fallon, E.
AU - Ma, Chi
AU - Armagan, S.
AU - Rahilly, M.
AU - Qiao, Yuansong
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - The Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) is a transport layer protocol which through its multi-homing features can support mobility. SCTP path failover is temporary in nature and is controlled by Retransmission Time Out (RTO) and Path Maximum Retransmission (PMR) parameters. In order to make an SCTP failover permanent (switchover) a Change Primary Threshold (CPT) parameter has been suggested. When SCTP fails over from a primary path, a HEARTBEAT packet is sent to attempt to reestablish primary path communication. CPT defines a limit of HEARTBEAT attempts which, when exceeded, results in configuration of an alternate path as primary. In this paper we illustrate a scenario in which the current understanding of SCTP failover aggressiveness is inappropriate. Studies have suggested that a low PMR = 0 results in the greatest throughput even when the alternate path is degraded. We illustrate that when high delay alternate paths with low loss rate are utilised, more conservative parameter configurations PMR = 3 give optimal performance. We also suggest that for optimal throughput moderate CPT values should be utilised.
AB - The Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) is a transport layer protocol which through its multi-homing features can support mobility. SCTP path failover is temporary in nature and is controlled by Retransmission Time Out (RTO) and Path Maximum Retransmission (PMR) parameters. In order to make an SCTP failover permanent (switchover) a Change Primary Threshold (CPT) parameter has been suggested. When SCTP fails over from a primary path, a HEARTBEAT packet is sent to attempt to reestablish primary path communication. CPT defines a limit of HEARTBEAT attempts which, when exceeded, results in configuration of an alternate path as primary. In this paper we illustrate a scenario in which the current understanding of SCTP failover aggressiveness is inappropriate. Studies have suggested that a low PMR = 0 results in the greatest throughput even when the alternate path is degraded. We illustrate that when high delay alternate paths with low loss rate are utilised, more conservative parameter configurations PMR = 3 give optimal performance. We also suggest that for optimal throughput moderate CPT values should be utilised.
KW - Heterogeneous Networking
KW - Mobility
KW - SCTP
KW - Switchover
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649625130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1049/cp.2010.0527
DO - 10.1049/cp.2010.0527
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:78649625130
SN - 9781849192521
T3 - IET Conference Publications
SP - 284
EP - 289
BT - IET Irish Signals and Systems Conference, ISSC 2010
T2 - IET Irish Signals and Systems Conference, ISSC 2010
Y2 - 23 June 2010 through 24 June 2010
ER -