Predictors of involuntary patients' satisfaction with care: Prospective study

Emma Bainbridge, Brian Hallahan, David McGuinness, Patricia Gunning, John Newell, Agnes Higgins, Kathy Murphy, Colm McDonald

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Involuntary admission can be traumatic and is associated with negative attitudes that persist after the episode of illness has abated. Aims We aimed to prospectively assess satisfaction with care at the points of involuntary admission and symptomatic recovery, and identify their sociodemographic, clinical and service experience predictors. Method Levels of satisfaction with care, and clinical and sociodemographic variables were obtained from a representative cohort of 263 patients at the point of involuntary admission and from 155 of these patients 3 months after termination of the involuntary admission. Data were analysed with multiple linear regression modelling. Results Higher baseline awareness of illness (B = 0.19, P < 0.001) and older age (B = 0.05, P = 0.001) were associated with more satisfaction with care at baseline and follow-up. Transition to greater satisfaction with care was associated with improvements in awareness of illness (B = 0.13, P < 0.001) and in symptoms (B = 0.05, P = 0.02), as well as older age (B = 0.04, P = 0.01). Objective coercive experiences were not associated with variation in satisfaction with care. Conclusions There is wide variation in satisfaction with coercive care. Greater satisfaction with care is positively associated with clinical variables such as increased awareness of illness. Declaration of interest None.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)492-500
Number of pages9
JournalBJPsych Open
Volume4
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Keywords

  • Mental Health Act
  • insight
  • involuntary admission
  • psychosis
  • satisfaction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of involuntary patients' satisfaction with care: Prospective study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this