Identification of mutagens in freshwater sediments by the Ames-fluctuation assay using nitroreductase and acetyltransferase overproducing test strains

Georg Reifferscheid, Sebastian Buchinger, Zhi Cao, Evelyn Claus

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    29 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Extracts of sediments from an area of concern in the Elbe river basins (Spittelwasser creek) were analyzed with the Ames-fluctuation test and in parallel with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for compound identification. The standard test strains TA 98 and TA 100 showed mutagenicity mainly in medium-polar fractions of the sediment extracts. PAHs contribute to the overall mutagenic potential of the sample. Especially, cyclopenta[c,d]pyrene that was previously not defined as a priority hazardous substance has to be considered as well. The addition of metabolically competent test strains, which overexpress nitroreductase and acetyltransferase (e.g., YG1041 and YG1042) to the test battery, increased significantly the sensitivity of the Ames test for medium polar to polar genotoxins. The increased mutagenicity that was found in these bacterial strains indicates the presence of nitroarenes and/or aromatic amines. In fact, a number of heterocyclic and nitrogen-substituted aromatic compounds were identified in the sediments of the Spittelwasser creek of which methyl parathion, 1-naphthylamine, and N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine are mutagenic.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)397-408
    Number of pages12
    JournalEnvironmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
    Volume52
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

    Keywords

    • Ames fluctuation test
    • Effect-directed analysis
    • Genetically modified test strains
    • Genotoxicity
    • Mutagenicity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Identification of mutagens in freshwater sediments by the Ames-fluctuation assay using nitroreductase and acetyltransferase overproducing test strains'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this