How does the dietary intake of female field-based team sport athletes compare to dietary recommendations for health and performance? A systematic literature review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Field-based team sports present large energetic demands given their intermittent high-intensity nature. Current evidence suggests that the dietary intake of female athletes may be insufficient to meet such demands, resulting in negative consequences for athletic performance and health. The primary aim of this review was to therefore assess the adequacy of dietary intake of female field-based team sport athletes when compared to dietary recommendations. A systematic search of databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and OpenGrey, was performed from the earliest record available until July 2020, obtaining an initial total of 2588 articles. To be included within the final review, articles were required to provide a quantitative assessment of baseline dietary intake specific to the target population. A total of 20 studies (n = 462) met the full eligibility criteria. A majority reported that the dietary intake of female field-based team sport athletes was insufficient in overall energy (2064 ± 309 kcal·day−1), carbohydrate (4.3 ± 1.2 g·kg·day−1), and iron intake (13.6 ± 6.2 mg·day−1) when compared to recommendations. Future research is required to establish why female team sport athletes consistently demonstrate deficient dietary practices, and to explore the potential negative consequences of this.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1235
JournalNutrients
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021

Keywords

  • Carbohydrate intake
  • Energy
  • Female health
  • LEA
  • Nutritional recommendations
  • Sports nutrition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How does the dietary intake of female field-based team sport athletes compare to dietary recommendations for health and performance? A systematic literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this