TY - JOUR
T1 - From therapeutic landscapes to healthy spaces, places and practices
T2 - A scoping review
AU - Bell, Sarah L.
AU - Foley, Ronan
AU - Houghton, Frank
AU - Maddrell, Avril
AU - Williams, Allison M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - The term ‘therapeutic landscapes’ was first coined by health geographer, Wilbert Gesler, in 1992 to explore why certain environments seem to contribute to a healing sense of place. Since then, the concept and its applications have evolved and expanded as researchers have examined the dynamic material, affective and socio-cultural roots and routes to experiences of health and wellbeing in specific places. Drawing on a scoping review of studies of these wider therapeutic landscapes published between 2007 and 2016, this paper explores how, where, and to what benefit the ‘therapeutic landscapes’ concept has been applied to date, and how such applications have contributed to its critical evolution as a relevant and useful concept in health geography. Building on themes included in two earlier (1999, 2007) edited volumes on Therapeutic Landscapes, we summarise the key themes identified in the review, broadly in keeping with the core material, social, spiritual and symbolic dimensions of the concept initially posited by Gesler. Through this process, we identify strengths and limitations of the concept and its applications, as well as knowledge gaps and promising future directions for work in this field, reflecting critically on its value within health geography and its potential contribution to wider interdisciplinary discussions and debates around ‘healthy’ spaces, places, and related practices.
AB - The term ‘therapeutic landscapes’ was first coined by health geographer, Wilbert Gesler, in 1992 to explore why certain environments seem to contribute to a healing sense of place. Since then, the concept and its applications have evolved and expanded as researchers have examined the dynamic material, affective and socio-cultural roots and routes to experiences of health and wellbeing in specific places. Drawing on a scoping review of studies of these wider therapeutic landscapes published between 2007 and 2016, this paper explores how, where, and to what benefit the ‘therapeutic landscapes’ concept has been applied to date, and how such applications have contributed to its critical evolution as a relevant and useful concept in health geography. Building on themes included in two earlier (1999, 2007) edited volumes on Therapeutic Landscapes, we summarise the key themes identified in the review, broadly in keeping with the core material, social, spiritual and symbolic dimensions of the concept initially posited by Gesler. Through this process, we identify strengths and limitations of the concept and its applications, as well as knowledge gaps and promising future directions for work in this field, reflecting critically on its value within health geography and its potential contribution to wider interdisciplinary discussions and debates around ‘healthy’ spaces, places, and related practices.
KW - Scoping review
KW - Therapeutic assemblage
KW - Therapeutic landscapes
KW - Therapeutic mobilities
KW - Wellbeing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034837046&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.035
DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.035
M3 - Article
C2 - 29175701
AN - SCOPUS:85034837046
SN - 0277-9536
VL - 196
SP - 123
EP - 130
JO - Social Science and Medicine
JF - Social Science and Medicine
ER -