TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating public and patient involvement in interventional research–A newly developed checklist (EPPIIC)
AU - Pyne, Elise
AU - Joyce, Robert
AU - Dwyer, Christopher P.
AU - Hynes, Sinéad M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2024 Pyne et al.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Public and patient involvement (PPI) has been identified as an increasingly desired and, often, required component of trial methodology–leading to higher quality, more accessible and relevant clinical research, alongside increased recruitment, funding success and insight into research impact. However, despite the great variety of frameworks and checklists available for assessing PPI, most are limited with respect to important features (e.g. applicable in specific contexts only, fail to clarify what should be assessed and reported, lack the necessary comprehensiveness or are biased in favour of researcher reporting). Thus, the current research aimed to address such limitations through the development of a new checklist, the EPPIIC, through review, thematic analysis and ‘meta-evaluation’ in conjunction with PPI engagement. Upon completion of the EPPIIC, three thematic ‘sub-scales’ emerged: (1) Policy & Practice, (2) Participatory Culture and (3) Influence & Impact. All findings are presented and discussed in light of theory and research. Notably, findings recommend EPPIIC as a useful means of assessing PPI in future trials.
AB - Public and patient involvement (PPI) has been identified as an increasingly desired and, often, required component of trial methodology–leading to higher quality, more accessible and relevant clinical research, alongside increased recruitment, funding success and insight into research impact. However, despite the great variety of frameworks and checklists available for assessing PPI, most are limited with respect to important features (e.g. applicable in specific contexts only, fail to clarify what should be assessed and reported, lack the necessary comprehensiveness or are biased in favour of researcher reporting). Thus, the current research aimed to address such limitations through the development of a new checklist, the EPPIIC, through review, thematic analysis and ‘meta-evaluation’ in conjunction with PPI engagement. Upon completion of the EPPIIC, three thematic ‘sub-scales’ emerged: (1) Policy & Practice, (2) Participatory Culture and (3) Influence & Impact. All findings are presented and discussed in light of theory and research. Notably, findings recommend EPPIIC as a useful means of assessing PPI in future trials.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208286188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0301314
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0301314
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85208286188
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 19
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 11
M1 - e0301314
ER -