Beyond control: Orientalist tensions and the history of the “upas tree” myth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The “upas tree” is one of the most enduring European myths about Southeast Asia. Accounts of a tree so toxic that it renders the surrounding atmosphere deadly can first be identified in fourteenth-century journey narratives covering what is now Indonesia. But while most other such apocrypha vanished from later European accounts of the region, the upas myth remained prominent and in fact became progressively more elaborate and fantastical, culminating in a notorious hoax: the 1783 account of J. N. Foersch. This article examines the history of the development of the upas myth, and considers the divergent responses to Foersch’s hoax amongst scientists and colonial administrators on the one hand, and poets, playwrights, and artists on the other. In this it reveals a significant tension within the emerging “Orientalist” discourse about Southeast Asia in the early nineteenth century.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-189
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Commonwealth Literature
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2020

Keywords

  • J. N. Foersch
  • John Mandeville
  • Orientalism
  • Rumphius
  • Thomas Stamford Raffles
  • colonial Indonesia
  • poison tree
  • upas tree

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond control: Orientalist tensions and the history of the “upas tree” myth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this