Abstract
The “upas tree” is one of the most enduring European myths about Southeast Asia. Accounts of a tree so toxic that it renders the surrounding atmosphere deadly can first be identified in fourteenth-century journey narratives covering what is now Indonesia. But while most other such apocrypha vanished from later European accounts of the region, the upas myth remained prominent and in fact became progressively more elaborate and fantastical, culminating in a notorious hoax: the 1783 account of J. N. Foersch. This article examines the history of the development of the upas myth, and considers the divergent responses to Foersch’s hoax amongst scientists and colonial administrators on the one hand, and poets, playwrights, and artists on the other. In this it reveals a significant tension within the emerging “Orientalist” discourse about Southeast Asia in the early nineteenth century.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 173-189 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Commonwealth Literature |
Volume | 55 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2020 |
Keywords
- J. N. Foersch
- John Mandeville
- Orientalism
- Rumphius
- Thomas Stamford Raffles
- colonial Indonesia
- poison tree
- upas tree